Tuesday, May 08, 2007
About Me
- Name: CPRR Discussion Group
Discussion Group – Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History Museum
Previous Posts
- Registerfly Hell
- "Replica trains head to This Is the Place: They'll...
- CPRR California/Nevada Tours
- CPRR Discussion Group
- Agriculture
- Summit Tunnel
- Track Plans
- Jobs - Pay
- Transcontinental Railroad Passenger Lists; First r...
- ... Port Huron ...
A log of messages discussing transcontinental railroad history and photography. Opinions are those of each person posting. PRIVACY.
SEARCH both the CPRR Museum and its CPRR Discussion Group:
To find replies, look for both comments linked to the original message and also for later messages.
SEARCH Problem
Anecdotes & Aphorisms
Favorite Camera Lenses
19th Century City Views
Railroad History Readings
Railroad Exhibits
Chinese Railroad Workers
Historical Accuracy
Discrimination Myths
Overestimating Mortality
Caution to Students
B&MLRR
Palace Hotel
Progress
Health Care Solution
No Robber Barons
Other Topics
How Not to Be Poor
How to be Rich
DONATE
"Dr. Ben's Kitchen!"
4 Comments:
See the earlier discussion.
Funding initially was primarily from the personal savings of the Big Four Sacramento merchants (Stanford, Crocker, Huntington, and Hopkins) and additional investors. These men each risked their entire life savings, as limited liability companies such as modern corporations were not yet available. The U.S. government provided funding with the Pacific Railroad Acts, starting in 1862, in the form of bonds sold to the public (issued only as construction proceeded and which had to be and were repaid in full with interest) and land grants. The government kept half of the land in alternating squares, giving the other half of the squares to the railroad, and the increase in value of the land due to building the railroad meant (as the U.S. Supreme Court later concluded) that the land grants were not really subsidies because the increase in value of the government's land exceeded the value of the land granted to the railroads. The cities of San Francisco and Sacramento also provided bond funding.
From: "Kevin Bunker" mikadobear45@yahoo.com
That's a very complicated question but the answers to which are well documented in a number of recent books on the subject. Among these is one stand-out book, The Great Persuader by David Lavender (covering biographically the involvemnent of Collis P. Huntington of the Central Pacific's "Big Four" directorate).
In Lavender's book we learn, through the letters written by Huntington (sealed at his death and unsealed by his descendants for Lavender's careful researtch and writing) and his colleagues how difficult it was to gather and build funding for the construction of the Central Pacific Rail Road from Sacramento. On the opposite side of the story, the Union Pacific's directorate – under the self-serving leadership of Dr. Thomas C. Durant – sought out funding in as many devious ways that would bring maximum cash profit to Durant and very few others while often leaving the UPRR to starve for supplies and even regular pay for the UP's construction crews and contractors long before the railroad was completed in 1869.
The Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History Museum website has a very good bibliographic list of titles that will help you find other books on the subject.
—Kevin
Who were the big 4 and why were they important?
Post a Comment
<< Recent Messages