Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History Museum
posted from CPRR Discussion Group at 8:36 PM
The weight of rails is expressed in pounds per yard (not per foot):"The weight of locomotives suggested by the advisers ranged from twenty to forty tons, the weight being limited by the carrying capacity of the fifty- to sixty-five-pound rails then available. Today steel rails are double these weights, and locomotives weigh ten to fifteen times more than was then deemed safe. ... "See the chart of Historic Rail Cross Sections 1767-1930 and (above the chart on the same webpage) a number of examples of original iron and replacement steel rail used on the transcontinental railroad.
Post a Comment
<< Recent Messages
Discussion Group – Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History Museum
View my complete profile
CPRR MuseumVisit CPRR.org
Contact Us – Ask a Question
A log of messages discussing transcontinental railroad history and photography. Opinions are those of each person posting. PRIVACY.
SEARCH both the CPRR Museum and its CPRR Discussion Group:
To find replies, look for both comments linked to the original message and also for later messages.
Wilderness/RR SAFETY WARNING! RR/Photo SAFETY WARNING!
1 Comments:
The weight of rails is expressed in pounds per yard (not per foot):
"The weight of locomotives suggested by the advisers ranged from twenty to forty tons, the weight being limited by the carrying capacity of the fifty- to sixty-five-pound rails then available. Today steel rails are double these weights, and locomotives weigh ten to fifteen times more than was then deemed safe. ... "
See the chart of Historic Rail Cross Sections 1767-1930 and (above the chart on the same webpage) a number of examples of original iron and replacement steel rail used on the transcontinental railroad.
Post a Comment
<< Recent Messages